In House vs. Agency
Author of this post: Chris Costello | About Blog Authors »
I have been asked this question on several occasions: “Where is the best place to work: at an ad agency or an in-house design department?” So, I though it might be helpful to give a breakdown of what are generally considered benefits and drawbacks of both. For the sake of a broad comparison, I include design studios along with “Agency” because they have many similarities.
Agency Drawbacks:
1. Job Insecurity: You or your design team may be assigned only one or two accounts at a time. If they loose an account, they may loose you as well. Some agencies are not as well prepared to weather economic downturns as are the corporations that hire them.
2. Long Hours: These employers tend to “own you” and convince you that there is no life outside of your job. When you are just starting your career, “paying your dues” can be exciting, but it looses its appeal over time after you begin to develop other interests and priorities.
3. Burnout: Some agencies like to hire young designers, knowing they may only get 2-3 good years out of them before they move on, so they will work them until they are quite toasty. They also know that the pool of designers is huge and vacancies are easily filled after they leave.
Agency Benefits:
1. Great Creative: You tend to focus on one or two projects at a time and can devote more energy to experimentation. The projects you work on can be very prestigious and the final deliverables become premier portfolio pieces.
2. Great People: At an ad agency, there is a larger group of “creative types”, such as artists, writers and directors that collaborate on projects. This environment provides opportunity for more honest critiques and a higher level of inspiration can be derived from other members of the team.
3. Higher Budgets and Salaries: More money is allotted for custom photography, illustration, travel, and…you, provided you survive boot camp and advance to a senior or director level, which can take 3-5+ years
4. Cool workspaces: When I worked in Miami we had creative briefing sessions out by the pool… then we went swimming. There are some funky (good) spaces where the work environment is just a fun place to spend the day… good music, great food, friendly pets and mascots of varying species all add up to a great time.
5. Bonuses: Chances are you will share in the company’s successes by receiving an annual cash bonus that correlates to the year’s profits. They are great incentives to make you stay “just one more year”.
In-house Drawbacks:
1. Less Creative Challenges: Although there are some creative opportunities, a large quantity of “bread and butter” work with the same branded messages is produced in-house. This can get monotonous if you don’t find way to stay inspired. At times, there can be even no work at all.
2. Less Pay: I’ve noticed the salaries can be slightly less than agency and studio designers and there is a lower chance of receiving an annual bonus. Read on for some possible reasons why.
3. Dull Workspaces: Accountants and creatives work in the same environment. Enough said here.
4. Dress Codes: Goths and dreadheads might have a hard time getting hired, but then, they are the types that would probably not prefer working under such conditions anyway. Unless you are employed for Apple or Google, a more conservative dress is mandated.
In-house Benefits:
1. Job Security: Most established corporations have deep pockets and can afford to staff up on designers to make sure their services will be available on call. It is usually more cost effective for a company to have an in-house design staff than to pay for outside creative services. Even when you are idle, the company still saves money by keeping you.
2. Company Benefits: This has always been a good selling point for working in-house. High quality health insurance, disability, retirement, severance, daycare, etc., tends to offset generally lower salaries. These perks may appeal more to an older designer with a family and a mortgage than to a recent graduate, but they are very valuable part of the overall compensation.
3. Predictable Hours: “9-5” is pretty much the rule. There is usually little need to work overtime and lately, more employers are allowing for flexible workweeks.
4. Respectable Portfolio Pieces: If you work for a “Big Name” corporation, your portfolio featuring design pieces with a recognized brand will bolster your confidence and reputation when you decide to interview for your next job.
Hopefully, these points of comparison will help you decide where you would like to start your first job. If you are already employed, maybe this can be a revealing glimpse of “the other side”. I have had several opportunities to work in both environments and I think that your station in life will determine which scenario works best for you. There is no real good or bad and each company and employment situation is unique. When I first left school, I wanted to work in ad agencies and design studios so I could start creating “awesome”, award-winning work… I really didn’t care how much money I made. Later on, however, I began to care more about making money and paying bills, so had to adjust my expectations accordingly. Job security and 401Ks became more appealing to me.
So, again as I recall writing in an earlier post, it’s about balancing what you want with what you need. The best advice I can give is just to get some experience of your own working at an ad agency, design studio and a corporate job, then decide for yourself where you want to invest your time.
This is by no means a comprehensive list of “pros and cons” since I have not worked in every type of environment, so please share any experiences or observations you could add that might be helpful.

















May 9th, 2008 at 7:36 pm
Wow…this is great advice. I love how you encapsulated all this knowledge into a nice neat article. Having experience on both sides, for me personally working in an in house design department works for me.
May 12th, 2008 at 9:42 pm
This is a general break-down, but not a “complete” one. A critical point was left out. In-house design, whether it is a large, medium or small corporation, can be just as “creative” as ad agency work. What will make the difference is the person in charge of the design group. With an in-house design team, the person overseeing the design work/team can choose the level of design they want the designer(s) to produce. Always be aware when talking to the person in charge what their design philosophy is. It could be someone who ‘just wants to get it done and go home’, or it could be someone who sees the value in good design work.
May 13th, 2008 at 2:29 pm
This is definitely not complete and I welcome anyone to fill in the gaps.
Excellent point, Teri. I lead an In-House staff and we have had some great creative projects and produced award-winning work over the past few years. Lately however, given the recent economic challenges, the volume of template-based work has increased dramatically while our creative projects have decreased. At times we are short staffed relative to the workload and just have to get the stuff out the door. It’s a challenge for us all and we hope things will change as the economy improves.
May 13th, 2008 at 6:58 pm
I just want to clarify that Chris never put the word “complete” anywhere in this post, it was me who added it to the headline. He was too gracious to point that out.
Johanna
June 5th, 2008 at 11:24 pm
This is a very good and very close representation of both sides. I too have been on in creative positions in both cases and prefer being corporate for more than one reason.
I am not the type that seeks to be a rock star. I am much more interested in helping the business grow. Keeping costs in-house vs. sending it to an agency is a big win for the company. I’ve hired both agency designers and corp. designers and own my own design agency. I feel the best designers I’ve worked with come from inside the business. They get the big picture. They can apply cool industry ideas but it makes sense to the client. I expect to measure results and if it doesn’t gain business it is out the door. Awards don’t mean anything to me. You can win a webbyaward and have a .01% conversion rate.
It’s all about the bottom line and building the business and the only way to see it happen is while you are highly involved on the inside.
June 6th, 2008 at 7:28 pm
Do you know of any research sites that touched on this subject.
I’m actually looking for information that supports the in-house creative team.
June 6th, 2008 at 7:35 pm
I don’t know of any off the top but have often thought about writing a book on this subject. I’ve often spoken with CD’s and agency owners on their thoughts of hiring a designer that has more in-house design exp. vs. agency. The typical response is they feel the in-house designer doesn’t understand their clients? Here is a direct response from a Design agency principal:
“Agency experience certainly plays a big part in my decision-making. I don’t have a comfort level hiring someone who’s never been responsible for the creative product of an entire business and all aspects of multiple clients’ marketing comm programs, as well as billing, the “creative product development”, and selling in a sense. It’s a big shift in my experience from someone who’s worked client-side. Not that the work isn’t as good or as hard, but the expectations I have - and our clients have - are different than someone who’s been in a managed, client-side environment.”
I feel that this individual has never really known who their clients are and cares more about the sale than the business and relationship.
June 16th, 2008 at 8:54 pm
I work for the In-House Agency Forum (IHAF) and we have all sorts of benchmarking surveys and salary surveys that look at the benefits of an in-house agency along with a comparison to the external agency world. If you are interested in finding out more, please email me at srush@pilenet.com. You can also check out more on our website, http://www.ihaforum.org. Our members include in-house agencies from LLBean, Disney, Bank of America, Yum! Brands, CVS, Reebok and many more of ALL sizes.
June 17th, 2008 at 8:58 pm
This is a pretty accurate description of both world. I have 22 years experience, starting with paste up in a small specialized studio to being senior art director at Marvel Comics in NYC. I worked in ad agencies (although small), printer, publishing, freelance, in-house (where I am now) and fabric design co. you name it.
Since I got a family, my priorities shifted. no more long hours, no more high stress. Actually, my present job offered some very cool creative opportunities that I would have never thought off. True about dress code, no more leopard pants with zippers and mohawk hairdo.
It’s good to experience as much as possible and not staying in only one category/field. What I tell people and younger designers is that on your death bed, who ’s going to be by your side? your old boss from years ago? or your loving family? That’s for me the bottom line.
June 17th, 2008 at 10:46 pm
the link in my comment above is including the period at the end of the sentence- if you are interested in checking it out, they correct link is http://www.ihaforum.org